Teaching Writing at LaGuardia

Resources for Faculty


Low-Stakes Assignment and In-Class Sequence on Ethics in Technical Communication for ENG 259 by Anna Voisard

|

Entry Point:


https://gothamist.com/news/engineer-arrested-for-lying-about-inspection-of-crumbling-
facade-that-killed-2-year-old

Texts (to be read for homework):

  1. Textbook:
    Chapter 3, Open Technical Communication (OTC)
    https://softchalkcloud.com/lesson/serve/PySpCEBQodADFZ/html or
    https://alg.manifoldapp.org/read/open-technical-communication/section/8b530f4b-5942-
    4071-845a-0a138601da10
  2. Article:
    “An Engineer’s Eureka Moment with a GM Flaw” by Bill Vlasic
    https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/29/business/a-florida-engineer-unlocked-the-mystery-
    of-gms-ignition-flaw.html

Homework Assignment

Read Chapter 3. Take note of the vocabulary (utility, rights, justice, and care) used to
discuss ethics.

  1. Read “An Engineer’s Eureka Moment with a GM Flaw” by Bill Vlasic.
  2. Then, write a 100-word response.
    o You can respond to any of a number of ethical dilemmas discussed in the
    article. Use the vocabulary of ethics as introduced in Chapter 3 to discuss the
    events described in the here are some ideas:
    o What is the “eureka moment” mentioned in the title?
    o Who is responsible for this situation? Why?
    o Who acted ethically? Who did not?
    o How could this situation have been handled better?
    o Who is responsible for Brooke Melton’s death?
    o Did anyone at GM take responsibility for the flaw or its handling?
    o How does this story depict an ethical dilemma? Is there more than
    one?

In-Class:

  1. In groups: Present one section of the chapter. Split the class into 6 groups. Each
    group will present the main points of its section.
    • 10 minutes of group work
    • 20 minutes of presentations
  2. Discussion of responses to Bill Vlasic’s article.
  3. Group work below.
    • 10 minutes of group discussion, 10 minutes of discussion

In-Class Group Work (Post-NYT article discussion)

With your group, answer the question at the end of each case study.
Case Studies/Readings on Ethics for In-Class Discussion:

  1. https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/more-focus-areas/engineering-
    ethics/engineering-ethics-cases/unintended-effects/
  2. https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/more-focus-areas/engineering-
    ethics/engineering-ethics-cases/giving-in-or-giving-up/
  3. https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/more-focus-areas/engineering-
    ethics/engineering-ethics-cases/this-land-is-your-land/
  4. https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/more-focus-areas/engineering-
    ethics/engineering-ethics-cases/to-ship-or-not-to-ship/
, , , , ,

0 responses to “Low-Stakes Assignment and In-Class Sequence on Ethics in Technical Communication for ENG 259 by Anna Voisard”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *